Australia News

Cash settlements on home insurance claims leaving vulnerable Australians short-changed, Asic says

4640-2
Foto : Patricia Davis - wanderstayfinder.com
Table of Contents
  1. ASIC Warns Cash Settlements Short-Change Cyclone Victims
  2. Related Reading

ASIC Warns Cash Settlements Short-Change Cyclone Victims

Wanderstayfinder.com – Homeowners rebuilding after Cyclone Jasper are being handed lump-sum payouts that fall well short of actual repair costs, according to a new Australian Securities and Investments Commission report. ASIC found that cash settlements on home insurance claims are disproportionately harming financially precarious policyholders who lack the resources to absorb overruns, locate contractors, or manage complex construction projects on their own. The commission urged insurers to recalibrate their approach toward what it called “realistic” compensation levels.

The findings draw on claims arising from Cyclone Jasper, which struck far north Queensland in December 2023. ASIC examined finalised claims across five companies that dominate the domestic market — Insurance Australia Group, AAI, QBE Insurance, Allianz Australia, and Sure Insurance. In more than 63 per cent of those claims, the insurer closed the file with a cash payment rather than managing the rebuild. At IAG and Allianz, the figure exceeded 80 per cent.

How the Numbers Get Set

A central concern in the report is the thin evidentiary basis behind each payout. Most offers rested on a single estimate from a builder already on the insurer’s preferred-supplier list. The homeowner was then expected to source their own tradespeople, supervise the work, and absorb any newly discovered damage or cost overruns — obligations that would ordinarily sit with the insurer under a managed-repair arrangement.

“The easy option for insurers can be the expensive one for homeowners,” ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland said. “If the amount falls short, consumers can be left shouldering the cost of repairs and paying the difference out of their own pocket.”

Although all five companies publicly stated a preference for managing repairs, none maintained systematic records explaining why a particular claim was closed with a lump sum rather than routed through a managed process. The decision to issue a cash payment appeared, in practice, to be made without documented justification.

When a Discounted Quote Collides with Market Reality

ASIC flagged a scenario in which an insurer’s preferred builder submitted a quote carrying a 40 per cent discount off prevailing market rates. The insurer paid out that discounted figure. When the homeowner then approached the same builder to complete the work for the cash amount, the builder declined. The commission expressed concern that supplier-specific discounts systematically understate what a homeowner would actually pay at open-market prices.

Some insurers attempted to build in a margin to bridge the gap between a discounted quote and true market cost. ASIC found, however, that none of the five companies operated a consistent, auditable system for applying such adjustments. The result was uneven, unpredictable compensation that left many policyholders short of the funds needed to finish repairs.

Who Gets Left Behind

The report also assessed how well insurers identified and supported customers in vulnerable circumstances — those facing financial hardship, cognitive impairment, or other factors limiting their capacity to navigate complex claims processes. Four of the five companies were found to have flawed frameworks for spotting and assisting such customers.

Information asymmetry compounded the problem. Insurers rarely supplied policyholders with sufficient detail to evaluate whether accepting a cash settlement was genuinely in their best interest. Three of the five companies did not inform consumers that their policies allowed them to reverse a decision after accepting a payout. Two of those three later told ASIC they had begun providing clearer communication about this right, though the commission did not specify whether the change had been fully implemented across all customer interactions.

Premium Context

The report lands amid a sharp escalation in home insurance costs. Analytics firm Finity calculated that premiums climbed 51 per cent over the five years leading to October 2025. The Australian Bureau of Statistics reported that insurance prices generally rose 4.2 per cent in the year to July, outpacing headline inflation of 3.5 per cent.

Frequently Asked Questions

What should I do if my insurer offers a cash payout after storm damage? Request itemised quotes from at least two independent builders at prevailing market rates before accepting any figure. Ask your insurer in writing whether the offer includes a margin above supplier-specific discounts, and confirm your right to reverse the decision within the policy’s cooling-off period.

Can I switch from a cash settlement to a managed repair after accepting? Under most Australian home insurance policies, yes — but only within a defined window. ASIC found that three of five major insurers were not informing customers of this right. Check your policy wording or contact your insurer’s claims team in writing to confirm the deadline.

Who regulates how insurers calculate these payouts? ASIC oversees the conduct of home insurance providers in Australia. If you believe a settlement was calculated unfairly, you can lodge a complaint with the insurer first, then escalate to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) if unresolved.

Leave a Comment