Uk News

Police use water cannon against rioters in Northern Ireland

Police Use Water Cannon Against Rioters in Northern Ireland Night of Tension in Belfast Police use water cannon against rioters - On the evening of June 10

Desk Uk News
Published June 11, 2026
Reading time 5 minutes
Conversation No comments

Police Use Water Cannon Against Rioters in Northern Ireland

Night of Tension in Belfast

Police use water cannon against rioters – On the evening of June 10, 2026, Northern Ireland’s police force deployed water cannons to quell unrest during the second consecutive night of anti-immigration demonstrations. The confrontation unfolded near the Sandyknowes roundabout, approximately eight miles north of Belfast, where a group of around 300 individuals engaged in chaotic behavior, including setting fire to a vehicle and hurling bricks and petrol bombs. The violence escalated as protesters targeted a nearby hotel suspected of housing migrants, demonstrating a clear intent to disrupt the community they claimed to defend.

Despite the intensity of the scene, the unrest in Derry and Coleraine remained relatively contained compared to the previous day. While disturbances were reported in these areas, the scale of chaos was smaller, reflecting a possible shift in focus or energy. The events of June 9 had been marked by larger mobs, who had attacked ethnic minorities following a knife assault in north Belfast that left a man in critical condition. This context underscored the emotional weight behind the current protests, with demonstrators driven by a mix of anger and perceived injustice.

Peaceful Protests and Community Reaction

Amid the chaos, some planned demonstrations failed to materialize. For instance, the anticipated rally at Belfast City Hall was abandoned, though a smaller group gathered at Stormont, the seat of Northern Ireland’s devolved government. The event concluded without major incidents, with participants expressing their grievances calmly. However, the family of Stephen Ogilvie, the man injured in the Monday night knife attack, issued a stark condemnation of the violence, emphasizing their plea for clarity and peace.

“We have witnessed a lot of false information circulating on social media which is now forcing us to clarify that our loved one is in fact in a stable condition, and we are solely focused on his recovery at this time,” the family stated in a police-issued declaration. The statement highlighted the family’s dismay at the scenes of disorder, asserting that such actions were not aligned with their values. “We want to make it absolutely clear that to do this in response is not supported by our family, and peaceful protest is only ever the way forward.”

The Ogilvie family’s stance contrasted sharply with the more aggressive tactics employed by some protesters. At Sandyknowes roundabout, demonstrators donned dark clothing and face coverings, a tactic intended to mask their identities and avoid immediate recognition. The group reportedly planned to use debris from the scene, such as torn garden fences and discarded tyres, as tools for both barricading and creating a fiery spectacle. This strategy led to the burning of a truck, with a white van allegedly driven into the flames by a man who left the engine running before leaping out.

Escalation and Immediate Aftermath

The confrontation reached a boiling point as police issued a final warning to the crowd. “Attention, attention, disperse immediately or water cannon will be used, no further warnings will be given,” the call echoed from police vehicles stationed at the roundabout. This moment of tension was captured by onlookers, including an elderly woman who remained at a bus stop between the officers and protesters, pulling her hood over her head to shield herself from the jet of water. “She said she’s lived through the Troubles, she’s not going to move,” another woman remarked, capturing the sentiment of those who viewed the violence as a continuation of longstanding societal divisions.

As the standoff stretched into the early hours, a group of spectators gathered in a nearby park, some filming the unfolding drama. A rioter, caught in the heat of the moment, shouted at passersby: “Put your fucking phones away or you’re fucking next.” The warning underscored the growing frustration among protesters, who saw smartphones as symbols of the media and public perception they believed were being manipulated. By 11:30pm, police managed to disperse the crowd, leaving behind a street strewn with bricks, litter, and upturned driveways used as makeshift weapons. The remnants of the fire, including the burnt shell of a vehicle, were addressed by firefighters who arrived to tackle the flames.

Legal Actions and Political Response

Following the incident, legal proceedings began against those responsible for the violence. Hadi Alodid, a 30-year-old resident of Duncairn Avenue, Belfast, was charged with the attempted murder of Stephen Ogilvie, the victim of the knife attack. Additionally, he faced a separate charge for carrying a knife in a public place on the same day, a detail that highlighted the escalation of tensions from a single act of violence to broader criminal charges.

Meanwhile, ministers in the Stormont executive issued a unified statement condemning the unrest that had gripped the region the previous night. “No community benefits from these actions,” they declared, noting the fear and risk of harm caused by the chaotic behavior. The ministers emphasized that while the incident in north Belfast had been deeply unsettling, it was now subject to legal processes, urging patience for justice to take its course. “They are weaponising the genuine hurt, concern and anger that people are feeling for their own misguided purposes,” the statement added, framing the protests as a reaction to misinformation rather than a unified cause.

Legacy of the Protests

The events of June 10 marked a significant moment in the ongoing discourse about immigration and community relations in Northern Ireland. While the use of water cannons demonstrated the authorities’ readiness to enforce order, it also sparked debates about the balance between security and civil liberties. The family of the stabbing victim remained a focal point of the discussion, as their efforts to combat false narratives highlighted the personal stakes involved in the protests.

As the fires were doused and the crowd dispersed, the aftermath painted a picture of both destruction and resilience. The remnants of the protest—burnt vehicles, scattered debris, and the lingering presence of the family’s message—served as a reminder of the complex emotions driving the demonstrations. The combination of fear, anger, and a desire for justice created a volatile environment, but the peaceful protest at Stormont offered a counterpoint, showcasing the potential for unity even in the face of conflict.

For the local community, the night of unrest left an indelible mark, with some residents expressing relief at the containment of the violence and others voicing concern over the broader implications. The events underscored the need for dialogue, as the line between protest and aggression became increasingly blurred. With legal actions underway and political leaders urging calm, the path forward remained uncertain, but the determination of both the protesters and the authorities was evident in the intensity of the confrontation.

Leave a Comment