Ex-Foreign Office chief Olly Robbins believed to be in talks over top security role
Ex Foreign Office chief Olly Robbins – The former head of the UK’s Foreign Office, Olly Robbins, is reportedly engaged in preliminary discussions with Andy Burnham’s team regarding a potential national security position within a government led by the potential new prime minister, according to the Guardian. Robbins, who was recently dismissed due to the Peter Mandelson vetting controversy, is now being considered for a prominent role under Burnham’s leadership. Sources indicate that senior advisors in Burnham’s circle have initiated early talks about appointing Robbins as a national security adviser, a position that would place him at the heart of the Cabinet Office and provide direct access to the prime minister on critical matters.
Robbins’ removal from his position in January 2025, following the revelation that he had overruled UK Security Vetting recommendations to deny Peter Mandelson clearance, has created a notable opportunity for a return to high-profile government work. The scandal, which emerged after the Guardian published details of the vetting process, has left senior Labour figures divided. While some have criticized Robbins for his handling of the case, others argue his actions were aligned with the priorities of the Labour Party’s leadership at the time. The controversy underscores a shift in momentum for Robbins, who was seen as a key figure in the Foreign Office until his abrupt departure.
The UK Security Vetting process, which scrutinizes candidates for security clearances, was central to the dispute. Mandelson’s association with Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted child sex offender, had raised concerns about his suitability for the role of US ambassador. Robbins’ decision to block Mandelson’s clearance, despite the vetting body’s recommendations, sparked questions about his judgment and the reliability of the system he once oversaw. However, his defense of the process, including his claim that the focus should be on the prime minister’s initial decision rather than the details, has left some observers uncertain about his approach to accountability.
Burnham’s team, which has gained prominence following his election as the MP for Makerfield, appears to view Robbins as a valuable asset. Internal sources suggest that Robbins’ experience in high-stakes diplomacy, including his role as the UK’s Brexit negotiator, makes him an ideal candidate for the national security adviser post. This role, currently held by Jonathan Powell since November 2024, is crucial for shaping the government’s strategy on global threats and international relations. While Powell received praise for his handling of issues such as Trump tariffs and the Iran conflict, he faced criticism over the Chagos Islands deal, which could position Robbins as a more politically adept replacement.
The vetting process for Mandelson has been a focal point of scrutiny, with the UKSC highlighting his links to China, Russia, and Israel as key concerns. Robbins’ reversal of the recommendation has raised eyebrows, particularly among Labour MPs who accuse the party of prioritizing political loyalty over security risk assessments. The Foreign Office’s refusal to release a summary of Mandelson’s vetting documents to the official compiling his appointment as US ambassador further fueled criticism, even as the government defended its actions during a Commons motion.
Despite the backlash, Robbins has maintained support within Whitehall. Senior civil servants have suggested that his dismissal was a result of being “forced” to expedite Mandelson’s vetting, aligning with No 10’s preferences. This perspective frames his removal as a strategic move rather than a personal failure, with some arguing that the focus should remain on the prime minister’s decision-making rather than the individual’s actions. Robbins, however, has not ruled out legal action against the government, claiming the incident damaged his reputation and credibility.
Within the Labour Party, opinions on Robbins’ suitability for a new role remain split. While Burnham’s team has praised him as an “outstanding operator,” others have questioned whether his return would be beneficial or divisive. Some Labour MPs have expressed concerns that Burnham’s administration, which has been formed with a blend of new and experienced figures, may lack the depth of expertise required for complex foreign and defense challenges. Robbins, a veteran of the civil service, could provide the necessary gravitas to address these gaps.
Robbins’ tenure at the Foreign Office, which began in January 2025, was marked by both praise and controversy. He had taken over from Sir Philip Barton, the previous permanent under-secretary, and was known for his efficient management of international relations. However, the Mandelson scandal cast a shadow over his work, leading to his sacking less than three months after taking the position. The incident has also prompted a reevaluation of the vetting process, with questions about transparency and oversight dominating the conversation.
During his testimony before the foreign affairs select committee in April, Robbins acknowledged the pressure he faced to expedite Mandelson’s appointment. He described the situation as a “constant pressure” to secure the post quickly, even as the details of the vetting process were being scrutinized. The committee’s inquiry into the matter became a pivotal moment in the political fallout, with some MPs using Robbins’ account to assess whether he deserved support or condemnation. His lighthearted remark about having “plenty of time on my hands” after being dismissed highlighted the personal toll of the controversy.
Starmer, who oversaw Robbins’ removal, has since faced mounting pressure to justify the decision. Many Labour MPs believe the appointment of Mandelson exemplified the prime minister’s flawed political judgment, particularly given the widespread concerns about his ties to Epstein and other international figures. The debate over Robbins’ role has also intensified as the government prepares for its next phase, with Burnham’s team seen as a potential stabilizing force. For Robbins, the offer of a top security position represents a chance to rebuild his reputation and influence within the political arena.
“You wouldn’t expect me to comment on individuals or individual appointments. I said at the time
