One Nation Senator Pushes for Mass Removal of Visa Holders in New Interview
Wanderstayfinder.com – Senator Malcolm Roberts has emerged as a prominent voice within One Nation, advocating for the removal of substantial numbers of foreign nationals from Australia. In multiple podcast appearances and public addresses, the senator has championed what he describes as “remigration” — a concept increasingly associated with far-right political movements worldwide. According to Roberts, the party aims to deport a minimum of 200,000 individuals, though this figure exceeds the organization’s officially published immigration stance.
Discrepancy Between Claims and Official Policy
During two separate podcast discussions, Roberts outlined One Nation’s intention to remove 100,000 temporary residents alongside another 100,000 international students. This combined total represents a significant departure from the party’s website, which currently pledges to deport 75,000 illegal migrants. The official policy specifically identifies visa overstayers, unlawful workers, and non-residents as primary targets for removal.
The party’s digital platform also commits to closing student visa loopholes that allegedly allow international students to transition into permanent residency or secure low-wage employment positions. However, Roberts presented a more ambitious vision during his November 2025 conversation with the 2 Worlds Collide podcast.
“We would also deport immediately anybody who’s here illegally, and that’s 100,000 people now … on contravention of their resident visas. That’s 100,000 we would deport, remigrate. Call it what you want. Get rid of them straight away,” Roberts stated.
He continued by addressing international students specifically: “Then we’ve got about an estimated 100,000 international students who are here illegally. They’ve either graduated and not gone home or they’ve breached their legal visa. So we would send them home.”
Reinforcement of Deportation Vision
Roberts reiterated these positions in a June interview with podcaster Brodie Buchal. He emphasized that approximately 100,000 individuals currently reside in Australia on temporary resident visas without proper authorization. Additionally, he noted that the actual number of students in violation of their visa conditions could be considerably higher than current estimates.
“We’d tighten the entry requirements, remigrate, deport, and then start working on the higher numbers of people we need to get rid of,” Roberts explained in the Buchal interview.
Hanson’s Endorsement of Mass Deportation
One Nation’s immigration stance has attracted fresh attention following Pauline Hanson’s appearance on Channel 7’s Spotlight program. During this meeting, Hanson encountered Rupert Lowe, the leader of Britain’s hard-right Restore Britain party. Lowe presented Hanson with a pamphlet titled “mass deportations,” to which she responded that both parties were “on the same page.”
When Seven reporter Liam Bartlett questioned whether Hanson supported the concept of mass deportation, she offered an enthusiastic affirmation: “I love it.” Despite this clear endorsement, One Nation has consistently avoided providing detailed explanations of how such a comprehensive deportation program would function in practice.
Expert Analysis and Challenges
MP Barnaby Joyce offered some insight into the timing of potential deportations, suggesting that removals would occur “as it becomes apparent that they’re not supposed to be here.” He noted that this process would include situations where individuals present themselves for medical treatment and their immigration status becomes evident.
Abul Rizvi, the former deputy secretary of the immigration department, expressed concerns about the financial implications of such a program. He described the cost of deporting large numbers of people as “eye-wateringly expensive,” particularly when compared to Trump-style operations like the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Recent statistics indicate that only approximately 2,000 individuals were apprehended, detained, and deported from Australia in the previous year, while an additional 6,000 departed voluntarily.
“It would cost a fortune and unless you did it carefully, it would result in massive errors and all sorts of problems,” Rizvi cautioned. “There is a sensible policy in this space to be developed, but you need to do it in a careful, well-targeted way that doesn’t increase in huge errors, huge numbers of people detained and clogging up court systems.”
The Remigration Concept Explained
Roberts’ frequent references to “remigration” connect his proposals to broader international trends. The term gained prominence through Trump administration immigration policies, which included establishing an “office of remigration” to manage deportations and facilitate the “voluntary return of migrants.” President Trump himself publicly discussed his intention to return “illegal migrants to their home countries (also known as remigration).” Beyond American politics, remigration has evolved into a significant concept within global far-right movements.
The Global Project Against Hate and Extremism has characterized remigration as “a white supremacist policy concept that calls for the forced removal of immigrants, refugees, and their descendants — including legal residents and citizens — based on race, ethnicity, culture, being perceived as ‘non-white,’ or a failure to ‘assimilate’.”
One Nation has been approached regarding Roberts’ interpretation of the term and his advocacy for it during various public engagements, including his speech to a conference where he further promoted the remigration agenda.
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Get rid of them?
Get rid of them is the main topic of this guide. The article explains the context, practical details, and next steps readers should understand.
Why does Get rid of them matter?
Get rid of them matters because readers are looking for a useful answer, not just a short summary. Good content should match search intent and help them decide what to do next.
