WanderStayFinder
Fast mobile article powered by Nexiamath-SEO AMP.
AMP Article

Ro Khanna says he supports Graham Platner’s bid for Senate despite ‘shameful’ actions

Published June 8, 2026 · Updated June 8, 2026 · By Mark Williams

Ro Khanna Supports Graham Platner's Senate Bid Despite Controversies

Ro Khanna says he supports Graham Platner’s Senate bid despite recent controversies surrounding the candidate’s behavior. As the November election in Maine approaches, the progressive Democratic congressman has reaffirmed his backing for Platner, a former Marine and oyster farmer running against Republican Senator Susan Collins. While Platner’s past actions—including explicit messages to women and a Nazi-themed tattoo—have sparked debate, Khanna emphasized that these issues did not overshadow his commitment to the campaign. The congressman, who is seeking re-election in California, described the allegations as “misogynistic and shameful” but noted that Mainers had long understood the candidate’s complex history.

Accusations and Accountability

Graham Platner’s campaign has faced growing scrutiny due to claims of misconduct. Khanna says he supports Platner, acknowledging the controversy while highlighting the candidate’s willingness to address his past. “His actions were misogynistic, they were shameful, they were wrong,” Khanna said, “but they didn’t come as a surprise to a lot of the folks in Maine.” The congressman credited Platner’s personal growth, noting his struggles with undiagnosed PTSD and alcohol use during a “dark period” in his life. “He came back broken in a dark place,” Khanna added, stressing that the candidate’s accountability was a factor in his decision to remain steadfast in support.

“People in Maine knew that he had had two tours of duty in Iraq. He came back broken in a dark place. That doesn’t excuse his behavior, but they knew this. He was in Washington, and then he went back to Maine, and he started an oyster farm.”

Testimonies and Controversies

Platner’s former girlfriend, Lyndsey Fifield, has detailed accounts of his behavior, which she describes as rooted in misogyny. In an interview with the New York Times, Fifield recounted incidents where Platner “grabbed her by the shoulders—sometimes hard enough to leave marks—and, on one occasion, yanked her out of a cab by her wrist after an argument when she wanted to stay in the car.” She also described a moment where he “twisted her arm behind her back, shoved her into a bedroom, and held the door closed from the other side so she couldn’t get out, telling her to remain there until she was ‘calm.’” These stories have intensified the focus on Platner’s conduct, with critics arguing that his past behavior casts doubt on his candidacy.

“Where were the screenshots they’d said they would use? Or the mention that I’d supported local Democrats and that most of my family (and husband) are liberal?”

Fifield has criticized the media for delaying her account and shaping it to favor Platner’s campaign. She claimed she was led to believe other women had similar experiences, though none have been confirmed. Platner’s campaign, meanwhile, has dismissed Fifield as a “lifelong GOP operative,” suggesting her testimony is politically motivated. The candidate later told Maine’s News Center that he had been candid about his struggles, describing his past as a time of “very dark periods” where he was “a far from perfect boyfriend.”

Public Perception and Political Strategy

Khanna says he supports Platner, noting that many Maine voters are willing to give him a second chance. “They knew that he had served in the military, faced personal challenges, and was striving to rebuild his life,” Khanna explained. This sentiment reflects a broader political strategy within the Democratic Party, where candidates with flawed histories are sometimes given a platform for redemption. While some argue that Platner’s record on issues like national health insurance and taxing billionaires justifies his candidacy, others see the race as a referendum on his character.

Platner has also addressed the Nazi tattoo, framing it as a symbol of unity rather than prejudice. “It represents my belief in standing together for common goals,” he said. However, critics point to the tattoo as a reminder of his past, which Khanna says he supports despite the controversy. The election has become a battleground not just for policy, but for moral judgment, with Platner’s campaign facing a critical test of public trust in the final stretch before November.