WanderStayFinder
Fast mobile article powered by Nexiamath-SEO AMP.
AMP Article

UK attorney general tells staff to stop using X amid disinformation concerns

Published June 19, 2026 · Updated June 19, 2026 · By Sandra Johnson

UK Attorney General Advises Staff to Cease Using X Amid Disinformation Concerns

UK attorney general tells staff to stop - The UK attorney general tells staff to stop using X, a move that has sparked discussions about the platform’s role in spreading disinformation. Richard Hermer, the attorney general, has directed his office to halt all activity on Elon Musk’s social media service, making it the first government department to officially discontinue its use. This decision follows growing worries over X’s contribution to the amplification of false information, which has been tied to incidents of racial violence and social unrest. Hermer’s office previously posted content on X, but now staff are being urged to avoid the platform unless it’s specifically for countering disinformation. The move reflects a broader ministerial push to reassess how social media influences public discourse and national unity.

Disinformation-Driven Incidents in Southampton and Belfast

Recent events in Southampton and Belfast have underscored the urgency of the UK attorney general’s directive. In Southampton, a surge of violence occurred after individuals on X claimed to be protesting a case involving Henry Nowak, a man who was handcuffed as he lay dying from a stab wound. His killer had initially accused the teenager of a racist attack, sparking chaos and leaving eleven officers injured. Similarly, in Belfast, far-right agitators used X to incite demonstrations following a stabbing, leading to attacks on minority communities. Health workers were questioned about their ethnic backgrounds on their way to work, with one MP describing the unrest as a “pogrom.” These incidents have intensified calls for stricter content moderation and increased accountability from social media platforms.

The UK attorney general tells staff that X’s algorithmic amplification of divisive content has played a significant role in these outbreaks. Hermer, who has consistently criticized the platform’s influence on societal cohesion, pointed to the Southampton and Belfast episodes as examples of how misinformation can escalate into real-world violence. While X has been used to disseminate information quickly, its capacity to spread harmful narratives has raised alarm. Hermer’s office now serves as a model for other departments to consider, though the government has not yet issued a comprehensive policy on the matter.

Government’s Defense of X and Regulatory Delays

Despite the UK attorney general tells staff to stop using X, Downing Street has defended the platform’s role in public engagement. Officials argue that X remains vital for connecting with diverse audiences, even as Musk has criticized the UK government and called for its removal. However, Hermer’s directive signals a shift in ministerial attitudes, highlighting concerns about the platform’s impact on public sentiment. The decision reflects a growing emphasis on balancing X’s utility with its risks, particularly in the context of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Hermer’s emphasis on disinformation has been echoed by critics within the government, who stress the need for faster regulatory action. While X has responded to pressure, the recent riots have prompted a more cautious approach. The attorney general tells staff that the government may now take a firmer stance on content moderation, potentially leading to stricter oversight or even legal consequences for platforms that fail to address harmful content. The delay in Ofcom’s assessment of X’s compliance has also drawn criticism, with some arguing that quicker intervention is essential to prevent further societal fractures.

Proposed Legislation and Regulatory Timeline

Ministers are working to amend the Online Safety Act, aiming to require social media companies to act more swiftly in removing inflammatory content during crises. The revised law would compel platforms to respond faster to posts that incite violence or racial hostility, aligning with the UK attorney general tells staff to stop using X. However, this change won’t take effect until mid-July at the earliest, leaving a gap in enforcement. In the interim, the government has deferred direct criticism of X to Ofcom, the media regulator, which is set to publish its first quarterly report on X’s compliance within two months.

Ofcom’s upcoming evaluation may provide clarity on whether X meets regulatory standards. The UK attorney general tells staff that this process is crucial for determining the platform’s responsibility in spreading disinformation. While the decision to halt X usage is symbolic, it also serves as a reminder of the ongoing debate over social media’s role in shaping public opinion. The attorney general’s office is now positioned as a leader in this effort, setting a precedent for other departments to follow as they navigate the complexities of digital communication and accountability.