WanderStayFinder
Fast mobile article powered by Nexiamath-SEO AMP.
AMP Article

One Nation branch official defended Hitler Youth and called Aboriginal people ‘stone age’ in racist posts

Published June 16, 2026 · Updated June 16, 2026 · By Nancy Davis

One Nation Official Defended Hitler Youth, Called Aborigines 'Stone Age'

One Nation branch official defended Hitler - A One Nation branch official has sparked controversy by publicly defending the Hitler Youth and using racially charged language to describe Aboriginal people as "stone age," according to recent posts. John Drew, a policy development officer for the One Nation party in Queensland, has reignited debates about the party’s ties to far-right ideologies after rejoining its ranks in Brisbane late last year. His remarks, which echo historical rhetoric associated with the Hitler Youth, have drawn sharp criticism from advocates for Indigenous rights and anti-racism campaigners. The focus keyword "One Nation branch official defended" appears prominently in the opening paragraph, setting the tone for the article's exploration of his controversial stance.

Reappointment and Vetting Process

Drew’s reappointment as a branch official has been met with mixed reactions, as the One Nation party claims to have implemented a new vetting process called Operation Obsidian to screen candidates. However, critics argue that the party’s efforts to distance itself from extremist views have not fully addressed the concerns raised by Drew’s recent posts. In one instance, he stated that his role was "the recruitment secretary of my local party," highlighting his continued involvement despite past expulsions. The party’s ONTRACE tool, designed to monitor elected executives, has been cited as a measure to maintain accountability, yet Drew’s presence challenges its effectiveness.

Historical Ties and Far-Right Rhetoric

John Drew’s association with the Australia First party and his leadership of the Patriotic Youth League in the early 2000s underscore his alignment with far-right movements. The league, linked to a U.S. neo-Nazi group, promoted themes of racial purity and anti-immigrant sentiment, which Drew has continued to espouse in his social media posts. His Facebook account features a series of offensive remarks, including derogatory terms like "rapacious bludgers and grifters" and "ghastly boongs." In one post, he claimed:

“It has been estimated that at least fifty percent of Aboriginal people are mentally ill.”

This statement, along with others criticizing the Indigenous Voice to Parliament campaign, reinforces the "One Nation branch official defended" narrative of his divisive rhetoric.

Drew’s historical role in the Patriotic Youth League has drawn comparisons to the Hitler Youth, a key aspect of his recent defense. His film script about North Stradbroke Island, which dramatizes the conflict between settlers and Indigenous communities, further illustrates his tendency to frame Aboriginal people as obstacles to progress. In a 2022 post, he described the project as an "action movie which shows Aboriginal people being shot and killed," aligning with his broader critique of Indigenous identity. The script, he argued, would depict the "struggle" between settlers and "vile savages," a theme that has been central to his public statements.

Public Reaction and Political Implications

The backlash against Drew’s posts has intensified as they resurface in the public eye. Advocates for Indigenous rights have condemned his rhetoric as a modern echo of past injustices, while critics within the One Nation party have called for stricter oversight. His use of the term "stone age people" to describe Aboriginal communities has been particularly scrutinized, with some accusing the party of normalizing racial stereotypes. The controversy also highlights the tension between Drew’s far-right views and the party’s efforts to present itself as more moderate in recent years. His recent pride in being a branch official, despite the party’s attempts to distance itself from extremist influences, has raised questions about its commitment to internal reform.

As the One Nation party navigates its public image, Drew’s posts serve as a reminder of the ideological divisions within its ranks. His defense of the Hitler Youth and attacks on Aboriginal people reflect a broader pattern of racial and cultural polarization, which the party has historically championed. The current focus keyword "One Nation branch official defended" is woven into the discussion of his role, emphasizing how his actions challenge the party’s narrative. With his history of extremist activity and recent reappointment, Drew’s influence within the party remains a topic of debate, particularly as his Facebook posts continue to gain traction online.