Global Development

Developing countries spend more repaying foreign debt than on education, UN reveals

Debt Burdens Outpace Educational Investment in Developing Nations, UN Report Shows Developing countries spend more repaying foreign - A comprehensive analysis

Desk Global Development
Published July 10, 2026
Reading time 3 minutes
Conversation No comments

Debt Burdens Outpace Educational Investment in Developing Nations, UN Report Shows

Developing countries spend more repaying foreign – A comprehensive analysis by the United Nations has revealed that the majority of developing nations allocated more financial resources toward servicing foreign obligations than to educational initiatives throughout the previous year. This critical finding emerges alongside projections indicating that worldwide assistance for schooling could contract by as much as thirty percent. Research conducted by Unesco, the organization responsible for culture and education matters, demonstrates that one hundred thirteen developing economies devoted greater sums to debt repayment than to education during 2025.

Regional Disparities and Growing Challenges

The imbalance between debt obligations and educational funding proves particularly acute across sub-Saharan Africa, where nations collectively spent three and a half times more on debt service compared to education expenditures. Unesco officials cautioned that this troubling pattern faces potential intensification due to anticipated reductions in financial support. Nations classified as low- and lower-middle-income have already experienced a twenty-one percent decline in educational assistance relative to 2023 levels, with projections suggesting losses could reach thirty percent by 2027.

Certain countries have endured even steeper declines. Afghanistan, Mali, Niger, and Liberia have each witnessed reductions exceeding forty percent in educational aid over a three-year timeframe. These dramatic cuts compound existing pressures on already strained educational systems across multiple continents.

Expert Perspectives on the Crisis

Current approaches really keep the countries trapped in a cycle of austerity, underinvestment and stalled development.

Min Jeong Kim, who directs Unesco’s education division, emphasized how existing frameworks perpetuate economic difficulties. She further noted that these conditions undermine nations’ capacity for sustainable growth while simultaneously reducing their ability to manage financial obligations over extended periods.

The severity of the situation becomes even more apparent when examining the most heavily indebted nations. Eighteen of these countries allocated five times their educational spending toward debt repayment, with Sri Lanka representing an extreme case where debt payments reached sixteen times educational expenditures. According to Debt Justice, a campaign organization based in the United Kingdom, repayments from poorer nations achieved their highest level in thirty-five years during the previous year. Fifty-six countries dedicated nearly one-fifth of their total revenue to servicing loans.

Multiple Shocks Drive Debt Accumulation

Tim Jones, policy director at Debt Justice, identified several compounding factors behind rising debt burdens. He explained that nations have faced successive crises including the pandemic, escalating energy costs, increasing interest rates, and severe climate-related disasters. These combined pressures have forced governments to redirect resources away from essential services.

Countries’ debt payments have ballooned following a series of shocks from Covid, energy price and interest rate rises and climate disasters.

In the worst-affected [countries], this is leading to cuts in spending on essential services such as health and education.

Contributing to the problem are reductions in assistance from the United States and European nations. Official figures from 2024 show educational funding decreased by six hundred million dollars, equivalent to four hundred seventy million pounds. Analysts expect this downward trend to continue through 2025.

Consequences and Proposed Solutions

The convergence of reduced aid and increased debt servicing has created significant disruptions within educational infrastructure. Many schools struggle to secure adequate operational funding, while teachers frequently experience delayed or missed payments. Looking ahead, experts worry that deteriorating education systems will impair indebted nations’ capacity to strengthen their economies and build resilience against future financial challenges.

Unesco advocates for restructuring debt relief mechanisms, moving away from temporary solutions toward arrangements that enable sustained public service funding. Jones highlighted the importance of preventing private lenders, predominantly headquartered in Britain and the United States, from obstructing agreements designed to benefit developing nations. He cited Ethiopia as a recent example where private creditors successfully blocked favorable terms to secure additional profits for themselves.

The UK needs to use its presidency of the G20 in 2027 to get major changes to the debt-relief process, including more debt cancellation and a faster process.

Central to this is incorporating the process into English law, so that private creditors can no longer disrupt and hold out from the debt relief.

These recommendations underscore the need for comprehensive reform that addresses both the structural weaknesses in international debt frameworks and the specific mechanisms allowing private creditors to undermine collective solutions.

Leave a Comment